johngelles wrote:
Robbrian wrote:
The Federal Reserve is already [supporting] its member banks who face insolvency. Since these are just book entries, why then can't the Fed do the same to fund the Commons?
Quote:
The Fed is and can do as R. suggests. The President only has to ask the Fed to do it. If they agree, its done, and interest free money will resuscitate the commons.
The idea is great, just like other great ideas (such as nationalizing the Fed). Great ideas don't always work out in practice, however.
Quote:
If the Fed declines, the Congress will usually have the last word.
I'm puzzled over that conclusion. Certainly congress should have the last word, and constitutionally does have it. The question is when is the last time they actually used it to overrule the Fed? I'll give you some time to think about it, or look it up. It's a bit rare to find congress "biting the hand that feeds it", so to speak. Maybe we need to see which is the dog and which is the tail.
Quote:
For the President to use his war and emergency powers to help congress spend debt free money, against the will of congress, would be novel.
"Novel" might be the understatement of the year. It would be nothing less than "revolutionary", IMO. I could easily envision civil war, and many other wars, breaking out over such a thing. But it would depend on the circumstances. Another tsunami wave would have to create another round of disasters in order for emergency powers to be justified, and even then it would be tough absent a congressional declaration of war, or insolvency. Such actions are precedent setting, and must be made very cautiously. Far better to have congress nationalize the Fed, end fractional reserve banking, and start printing the interest-free money that is needed to get the economy back up and running better than ever before. After all, China is already doing this, and if we lag too much longer the USA is going to become a third rate economy by comparison.
Of course, this is exactly what some people think the banksters have planned for the USA. After all they have never had any real national allegiances ... never.
Quote:
Jefferson would have done it IMO. Washington, Lincoln, and FDR did not have to: congress was in agreement with them.
Yes, maybe, and maybe not, IMO. FDR should have nationalize the Fed, and printed, rather than borrowed, all the new deal reconstruction money. Then we would have had a different, and far better 20th Century, and we would not be facing worldwide economic meltdown today.
And we are, you know. The stimulus and bankster-bailout money has checked the economic crash for now, but the dollar is eventually going to crash and burn in a blaze of deflationary hyper-inflation - just like what happens when matter collides with anti-matter. Boom! It all goes boom. Then we get to start all over again from scratch, if we are lucky, and the planet is still habitable.
A moratorium on interest would help some, but it will not replace fixing the system to eliminate the interest on money (usury) that arises from private money creation. Nor will it eliminate the steady creeping inflation that has been going on since 1913, and amounts to a "stealth tax" on everyone's wealth, mostly old and/or retired and disabled persons or the unemployed.
I suspect that if enough populist pressure were building for nationalization of money creation, a moratorium on interest would be immediately offered. Then people would forget about reforms and they could resume business as usual after a short while.
We need a movement to "make them do it"!!!